robbie_rash wrote: I've yet to see a design from the developers that is not a fantasy.
Where's the fantasy ?
The council wants to re-develop the West Kirby waterfront ? - fact
They want to redevelop the lake and it's facilities - fact
They have a plan for the town including a hotel, Supermarket, and parking - fact
Carpenter Investments won exclusivity to come up with development proposal - fact
The council put this 'exclusivity' out to tender 2 years ago - fact
CI have been consulting both publically and privately - fact
They have not finished consultation - fact
They have come up with numerous designs - fact
They have not come up with a final design - fact
They want the WK locals 'onside' - fact
If I had a penny for every time somebody said to me "Ha Ha loving the debate on iW with you and Robbie_Rash and CaptainNemo. By the way can't see their problem...." then I'd have quiet a few pennies indeed.
btw. Captain Nemo'a main argument seems to be around consistantly pulling the 'local' card. How will it benefit the locals ? You shouldn't have a say you live outside WK....etc
I'm actually coming around to his argument and way of thinking so I'm going to the council to propose the following.....
Close the marine lake - only benefits a TINY proportion of residents - too many outsiders
Close the beach - whilst frequented by some locals...Too many bloody outsiders
Close all the resturants - whilst frequented by some locals...Too many bloody outsiders too
Close the road between Montgomery Hill to Hoylake - too many outsiders communte on it.
Close the Concourse - not all the locals use it - make the outsiders go to the Oval.
Dig up anyone not born and bred in the town from the Ce_meta_ry - Locals only.
Ern